Prabhuji & Anr. vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Appointment & 40 ... on 16
being arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the settled law on the point. Clause 6(c) is reproduced below-
"6 (c).In the cases ... teaching as well as non-teaching staff:
(a).........
(v)The Roster, 40-point or 100-point as the case may be, shall be applied
when all the roster points in the cadre are
filled, the required percentage of reservation in post is
achieved. The roster point in a cadre ... these vacancies have to be filled in,
according to the roster points. That is precisely what is sought
to be done in the present case
years and must not have crossed the age of 40 years on July 1, 2013 i.e. they must have not born earlier to second ... candidates belonging to SC/ST/OBC/DFF.
10. It has been pointed out by Shri Alok Misra that 1994 Act stipulates that in public services
persons of age, and for indicating and indexing the roster points in the 100 point roster, for reservation to be provided on horizontal basis ... provision of applicability of reservation for physically handicapped persons in 100 point roster in a manner for providing Point No.33 in the first round
merit list was not prepared in accordance with law ; the rostering was done against the Government orders and rules ; that the reservation rules were ... were given appointment after about an year. For instance, it was pointed out that the candidates
Shivagopal vs State Of U.P. And 4 Othrs. on 8 May, 2019
Equivalent citations
Heera Lal Umar Son Of Late Sri Moti Lal And ... vs State Of U.P
Divya Goswami vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 3 November, 2020
Author
Anand Kumar Yadav And 2 Others vs Union Of India Thru Secy. And 4 Others