Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 844 (0.95 seconds)

Mr.A.D Alexander vs Union Of India Represented By The ... on 29 March, 2011

Point Roster Shortfall SC ST (a) Existing Point No.1 09 04 The 40 point reservation roster pertaining to the year 1995 was perused ... under:(F.73) SC ST Sanction 40 06 03 Actuals 06 02 ---------------------------------- Shortfall - - -1 --------------------------------------- 40 Point Roster Shortfall SC ST (a) Existing - - (b) Point accrued
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr.A.D Alexander vs Union Of India Represented By The ... on 29 March, 2011

Point Roster Shortfall SC ST (a) Existing Point No.1 09 04 The 40 point reservation roster pertaining to the year 1995 was perused ... under:(F.73) SC ST Sanction 40 06 03 Actuals 06 02 ---------------------------------- Shortfall - - -1 --------------------------------------- 40 Point Roster Shortfall SC ST (a) Existing - - (b) Point accrued
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Brij Mohan Meena vs M/O Railways on 8 May, 2023

Clerk in the year1991, against a vacancy to which, according to 40 point roster, only S.T. candidates were eligible for consideration ... post on the basis of his being the eligible candidate following 40 point roster). His request has been denied, by letter dated 05.03.2010 (Annexure
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next