CHANDCRIC 23, (2003) 3 ALLCRILR 939, (2003) 1 CRIMES 419, (2003) 1 ALLCRILR 19, (2003) 2 ALLCRIR
Singh Tyagi vs State on 13 March, 2002
Equivalent citations: 2002IVAD(DELHI)419, 2002CRILJ2872, 97(2002)DLT374, 2002(62)DRJ870
JUDGMENT
Khan, J.
1. Petitioner
EASTCRIC 456, (2002) 1 HINDULR 509, (2002) MATLR 262, (2002) 22 OCR 419, (2002) 2 RAJ CRI C 310, (2002) 1 RECCRIR
Madhya Pradesh on 20 March, 2002
Equivalent citations: 2002(2)ALD(CRI)419, 2002(2)ALT(CRI)330, JT2002(SUPPL1)SC92
Bench: R.P. Sethi
419 : (1955 Cri LJ 1004) was explained and distinguished and it was held that there was no rare conflict between these decisions. In State
recent judgment can be relied upon reported in (2002)
22 OCR (SC) 419 in the case of Baburam -V- State of Madhya Pradesh. From
recent judgment can be relied upon reported in (2002) 22 OCR (SC) 419 : (2002 Cri LJ 1018) in the case of Baburam v. State
against the petitioner Satyadeen @ Ram Singh and others for offence under Sections 419 / 468 / 420 / 471 read with Section 34 , IPC on the complaint
alleged to have committed the offences punishable
under Sections 120B, 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 474 read with
Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. Annexure