Arjun And Anr. Etc. Etc vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 14 February, 2017
CRILR(RAJ) 183, (2017) 1 UC 513, (2017) 3 MH LJ (CRI) 436, (2018) 1 MADLW(CRI) 65, (2017) 1 CRIMES
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 3319 (2.61 seconds)Mohibur Rahman And Anr. vs State Of Assam on 21 August, 2002
436, 2002 (4) LRI 163, (2002) 6 JT 235 (SC), 2002 (6) SCALE 49, 2002 SCC(CRI) 1496, (2002) 6 SCALE
Malkiat Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab on 10 April, 1991
CRIMES 191, (1992) EAST CRI C 98, (1991) 2 REC CRI R 436, (1991) CAL CRI LR 150, (1992) 1 CHAND
Savitri Agarwal & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 10 July, 2009
436, (2009) 4 MAD LJ(CRI) 201, (2009) 3 EASTCRIC 290, (2009) 4 CHANDCRIC
Chacko Alias Aniyan Kunju & Ors vs State Of Kerala on 21 January, 2004
KHCACJ 564 (SC), 2004 CRILR(SC&MP) 436, (2004) 16 ALLINDCAS 727 (SC), 2004 (16) ALLINDCAS 727, 2004 (1) KHCACJ ... CRILR(SC MAH GUJ) 436, 2004 (2) SRJ 368, 2004 (1) SLT 941, (2004) 1 JT 358 (SC), (2004) 1 CURCRIR
Sukhram S/O Ramratan vs State Of M.P. on 13 January, 1989
Section 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C. and under Section 436 read with Section 34 I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment ... were framed against Gokul and the appellant individually under Sections 302 and 436 I.P.C. alternatively under Sections 302 read with
State Of Punjab vs Mohinder Singh & Ors on 28 September, 2007
ALLCRILR 621, 2009 (2) SCC(CRI) 436, 2007 CRILR(SC MAH GUJ) 795, 2007 (38) OCR 663, 2007 CRILR(SC&MP) 795, 2007 (6) SUPREME
M.A. Abdulla Kunhi And Others vs The State Of Kerala on 15 January, 1991
EASTCRIC 260, (1991) 1 GUJ LH 444, (1991) MAD LJ(CRI) 436, (1991) 2 CRILC 10, (1991) 1 CHANDCRIC 72, (1991) 1 CRIMES 453
Author
Jagdish vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 February, 1979
436, (1979) MAD LJ(CRI) 606
Author: Syed Murtaza Fazalali
Bench: Syed Murtaza Fazalali , O. Chinnappa Reddy
PETITIONER:
JAGDISH
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
DATE
State vs Ram Lakhan And Ors. on 13 January, 1954
11th September 1921, declares that the trial oi an offence under Section 436 must be by jury and not by assessors, the assessors are incompetent ... assumption in the observation quoted above that because the trial under Section 436 , I. P. C., could not have been with the aid of assessors