counsel appearing for both the parties submit
that in view of 44th Amendment, Right to hold the property is no
more a fundamental rights ... come into force on
29.10.1974 much prior to the 44th amendment, on which date,
the provisions of Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(3) were
counsel appearing for both the parties submit
that in view of 44th Amendment, Right to hold the property is no
more a fundamental rights ... come into force on
29.10.1974 much prior to the 44th amendment, on which date,
the provisions of Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(3) were
counsel appearing for both the parties submit
that in view of 44th Amendment, Right to hold the property is no
more a fundamental rights ... come into force on
29.10.1974 much prior to the 44th amendment, on which date,
the provisions of Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(3) were
acquisition)."
6. He further contends in view of 44th
Amendment to the Constitution of India, Right to hold
property is no more a fundamental ... question had been enacted by the State,
11
subsequent to 44th Amendment to the Constitution of
India. According to him, 44th Amendment has come
into
contend that despite the provisions of Section 1(2) of the 44th Amendment Act, Article 22 of the Constitution stood amended on April ... when the 44th Amendment Act received the assent of the President and that there was nothing more that remained to be done by the executive
Smt K M Chikkathayamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 March, 2016
Author: Anand
behest of the appellants-petitioners. Prior to the Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978 , the right to property was guaranteed by Article 31. While clause ... hold the property, has also been omitted by the same 44th Amendment Act, 1978 . The consequence of these changes brought about by the Constitution (44th
court on any ground. Clause (5) has been
deleted by the 44th Amendment and, therefore, any
observations made in the Rajasthan case [State of
Rajasthan ... court on any ground.
Clause (5) has been deleted by the 44th Amendment and,
therefore, any observations made in Rajasthan case [State
of Rajasthan
John B. James And Others vs Bangalore Development Authority And ... on 7 August, 2000
Equivalent
Government to issue a notification under S, 3 of the Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978 for bringing its provisions into force. Supreme Court said ... regards the time for bringing the provisions of 'the 44th - Amendment into force, it is not for the Court to compel the Government
