Section 460 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 460 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
460. All persons jointly concerned in lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night punishable where death
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 7593 (2.65 seconds)Abdul Aziz vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 May, 2007
cannot, be
considered to serve as an exception to Section
302 , Indian Penal Code. If a person committing
house-breaking by night also actually commits ... dealt with
under Section 460 . Neither the language of
Section 460 nor the scheme of Indian Penal
Code nor logic and common sense would seem
Willson Abraham Chouriappa vs State Of Maharashtra on 19 June, 1995
three counts namely Section 460 , IPC, 396 read with 397, IPC and Section 302 , IPC deserves ... three counts namely Sections 460 , IPC, 396 r/w 397, IPC and 302, IPC is set aside
Emperor vs Mathuri And Ors. on 26 November, 1935
Penal Code is an offence which includes theft, extortion or criminal misappropriation, but it is urged that offences under Sections 457 and 460 , Penal Code ... offence under Section 302 , Penal Code, does not include theft it is immaterial whether offences under Sections 457 and 460 do or do not include
Prabhuram vs State on 13 October, 2009
various Sections of the Indian Penal Code as follows:
All ACCUSED Life imprisonment alongwith a fine
U/s. 302/149 IPC ... from Sec.302 / 149 IPC to Section 304 part II
12
IPC read with 149 IPC , they are sentenced
Kewal Krishan vs State Of Punjab And Others on 18 October, 2012
cannot, be considered to serve as an
exception to Section 302 , Indian Penal Code. If a person
committing house-breaking by night also actually commits ... dealt
with under Section 460 . Neither the language of Section 460
nor the scheme of Indian Penal Code nor logic and common
sense would seem
Haradhan Das vs State Of West Bengal on 13 December, 2012
Sections 458 , 459 , 326 , 302 and 120B of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘ IPC ’). However, charge against the
accused persons were ... appellant could be convicted for
committing an offence under Section 460 IPC, the offence for which the
accused was charged and tried
Dharampal Singh And Anr. vs State Of Rajasthan on 29 September, 1997
therefore, the offence committed by the appellants actually falls Under Section 460 , IPC and since the punishment prescribed for offences Under Sections ... 460 , IPC are identical, they should be convicted for offence Under Section 460 , IPC. According to him, the charge for offence
Raju @ Raj Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 May, 2007
Bhanwar Lal have committed punishable crime
u/s 460, 148 and 302 of Indian Penal Code for
which their crime is hereby proved ... under Section 302 read with Section
149 , 148 , 120B and 460 of Indian Penal Code.
66. This case is a matter of murder,
conspiracy
Mahendra Saini vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 19 April, 2018
fine of ₹7,000/- with default stipulation,
for offence u/S.460 IPC he has been sentenced to rigorous
imprisonment for five years ... Appellant Vinod Saini was convicted for offence
u/Ss.302/34, 460 IPC & S.4 / 25 of the Arms Act. For
offence