BOMCR(CRI) 494, (2008) 62 ALLCRIC 976
Author: Arijit Pasayat
Bench: P. Sathasivam , Arijit Pasayat
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
494, 2008 (2) AIR JHAR R 698, 2008 (2) SRJ 501, (2008) 2 JCC 892 (SC), 2008 CRILR
ALLMR(CRI) 545, (2009) 1 CGLJ 385, (2010) 1 ACJ 494, (2009) 1 CHANDCRIC 134, (2008) 41 OCR 823, (2008) 4 CURCRIR
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jammu alleging commission
of offence punishable under Section 494 of the Ranbir Penal Code, 1989
(1932 AD) (in short ... three persons and it was noticed that the offence
punishable under Section 494 RPC was exclusively triable by the Court
of Sessions. The date
strict as is required in a trial of offence under Section 494 of
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short
Madras High Court
Malayil Kottayil Koyassan Kutty, In re (AIR 1918 Mad
494) and it was observed that there was nothing in
law against ... Koyassan Kutty, (AIR
1918 Mad 494), Kumariah v. Chinna Naicker, (AIR 1946 Mad 167), and
several other decisions, the learned Judge came to the conclusion
Dhanalakshmi v. R. Prasanna Kumar
and others (AIR 1990 SC 494), State of Bihar and another v. P. P. Sharma,
I.A.S. and another
Dhanalakshmi v. R. Prasanna Kumar and others (AIR 1990
SC 494), State of Bihar and another v. P. P. Sharma, I.A.S.
and another
interference. (See Mrs. Dhanalak-shmi v. R. Prasanna Kumar, AIR 1990 SC 494 : (1990 Cri LJ 320)). Appropriately, therefore, in a case where the accused
necessary as is necessary in cases of proceeding under Section 494 , Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short T.P.C) or a proceeding for divorce
