Section 498 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
498. Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman.—
Whoever takes or entices
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24224 (6.56 seconds)State Of U.P vs Santosh Kumar & Ors on 3 September, 2009
were charged under
sections 302 / 34 , 304-B and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code,
1860 (for short, ` IPC ') and sections ... Dowry Prohibition Act
as well as under section 498-A I.P.C. The trial Court
ought to have acquitted all the appellants for
offences
Social Action Forum vs Union Of India And Ors. Minstry Law And ... on 14 September, 2018
Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short,
„the IPC ‟).
2. Section 498-A was brought into the statute book ... Indian
Evidence Act and Sections 498-A and 304-B to the Indian
Penal Code by subsequent amendments. Section 113-A
Evidence Act and 498
Thanu Ram vs State Of M.P on 5 October, 2010
offence punishable under Section 498-A and 306
of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) and sentenced to
undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years ... meaning as in section 498-A of the Indian
Panel Code (45 of 1860)."
18. Section 107 IPC clearly defines abetment
Gurjit Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 26 November, 2019
under Section
Signature Not Verified 304B and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code , 1860
Digitally signed by
SATISH KUMAR YADAV
Date ... suicide, and
thereby committed an offence punishable under Section
498A of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 and within the
cognizance of this court
T. Balaji Rao vs State Of A.P. And Anr. on 3 March, 2006
complainant to cruelty and thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C.
5. On the said further report, the learned Magistrate ... with criminal offence either under Dowry Prohibition Act or under the Indian Penal Code and they are concerned only with a matrimonial conduct that constitutes
Mohit Gupta And Ors. vs State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr. on 16 October, 2006
learned Metropolitan Magistrate did not frame any charge under Section 498-A IPC. Nor did he frame any charge under Section ... 498-A, whatever be the legitimacy of the marriage itself for the limited purpose of Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC. Such
Daggupati Jayalakshmi vs The State on 23 June, 1993
offences compounded even though the offences under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code is non-compoundable. In the above decision of T. Venkatalakshmi ... Indian Penal Code was introduced in the year 1983, after a long lapse of time. Indian Penal Code was introduced in the year
Phool Singh And Another vs The State on 22 March, 2010
years. The appellants
have also been convicted under section 498-A , IPC and sentenced to
suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three ... single solitary
demand would not fall within the ambit of section 498-A IPC.
Counsel for appellants contends that the unfortunate incident
Sangannagari Narasimulu vs State Of Andhra Pradesh Represented By ... on 22 July, 2005
reasonable doubt, but succeeded to prove the charge framed under Section 498-A I.P.C. Hence, the learned appellate Judge set aside the conviction ... confirmed the conviction recorded for the offence under Section 498-A I.P.C. The sentence of three years and payment of fine