Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 6275 (1.46 seconds)

Ajit Narayan vs Union Of India on 27 August, 2010

provisions of Fundamental Rule 56 (j) [hereinafter referred to as 'FR 56 (j)'], applicable to the central government employees are not applicable ... remove the petitioner from the post in question, provisions of FR 56 (j) has been applied and the petitioner compulsorily retired. Apart from contending that
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

K.Selvaraj vs ) The Central Industrial on 5 July, 2008

gazetted", therefore, the provision of sub-clause (ii) of FR 56 (j) would be applicable. Grade -C employees may be retired prematurely after attaining ... necessary to quote the Fundamental Rule 56 (j) which reads as under: "56(j) Notwithstanding anything contained in this rule, the Appropriate Authority shall
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S.S. Das vs Union Of India on 18 January, 2024

requirement in the case of disciplinary proceedings. While exercising power under FR 56(j), the Appointing Authority can take note of such allegations. Once ... life are forfeited. In contrast, the compulsory retirement under FR 56(j) would have the effect of just advancing the age of retirement and nothing
Delhi High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - V K Rao - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next