Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2027 (1.73 seconds)

Shri Ram Hit vs Union Of India on 20 January, 2012

following orders: Order/notice dated 6.11.2009, for compulsorily retirement under FR 56(j) on attaining the age of 55 years, issued by the Director Postal ... reviewed, for their retention in service/otherwise under the provisions of FR 56(j) and Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, by the Circle
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amresh Jain vs M/O Finance on 26 November, 2024

completed 50 years of age and therefore following the mandate of FR 56(j), his name was considered by the Screening Committee. The said Committee ... find any material to invoke the provision of FR 56 (j) in the case of applicant. However, the applicant was compulsorily retired by invoking
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Umesh Kumar Goel vs M/O Finance on 12 March, 2025

order vide which his representation submitted against his compulsory retirement under FR 56 (j) was rejected. Vide order dated 18.12.2024, the said Misc. Application ... governing the compulsory retirement of a Government Servant as contained in FR 56 (j) as well as the instructions on the subject issued
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jarnel B Singh vs Revenue Cbdt on 8 May, 2026

applicant was considered by a three-member Representation Committee constituted under FR 56(j) and Rule 48 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Committee ... 56(J), the relevant portion of which is reproduced below:- "16. The provision of Fundamental Rule 56(j) reads as under: "FR 56
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ahmedabad Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R K Bothra vs M/O Finance on 12 January, 2026

alia Rajendra Kumar Bothra is fit case for compulsory retirement under FR 56 (j). The Committee noted three charge sheets against the applicant issued ... Shri R.K. Bothara be compulsorily retired in public interest under FR 56 (j). Notwithstanding the order of the compulsory retirement, the departmental inquiries otherwise
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jodhpur Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next