Judge in
Vinayaga Agencies v. CCT [Vinayaga Agencies v.
CCT, (2013) 60 VST 283 : 2013 SCC OnLine Mad
323] . However, the view cannot be applied ... view in Vinayaga Agencies v. CCT [Vinayaga
Agencies v. CCT, (2013) 60 VST 283 : 2013 SCC
OnLine Mad 323] in all cases merely because
Corporation Limited Vs. State of Assam & Others
reported in (2013) 60 VST 185 Gau, wherein it has been held that when the
time limit
case of State of
Karnataka Vs. Vasavamba Stores -
[2013] 60 VST 19 (Karn.),
Honourable Karnataka High Court
has clearly dealt with the issue
whether Fryums
Assistant Commissioner (CT),
Vadapalani-1 Assessment Circle, Chennai reported in (2013) 60 VST 283
(Mad).
(ii) Althaf Shoes (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT)
Valluvarkottam
Indian National Shipowners Association V. Union of India
((2009) 21 VST 60) where the ourt has held that there could be no charge on
receipts
Assistant Commissioner (CT),
Vadapalani-1 Assessment Circle, Chennai reported in (2013) 60 VST 283
4/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Assistant Commissioner (CT), Vadapalani-I
Assessment Circle, Chennai reported in 2013 60 VST 283 (Mad).
4. It is further submitted that the impugned order, insofar
Commissioner (CT), Vadapalani 1 Assessment Circle,
Chennai – 6 reported in (2013) 60 VST 283 (Mad);
(iii)Deputy Commissioner (CT) Trichy Vs.
N.Subramania Chettiar reported
Assistant Commissioner (CT), Vadapalani-I
Assessment Circle, Chennai reported in 2013 60 VST 283 (Mad).
4. It is further submitted that the impugned order, insofar
Association and Another vs.
Union of India and Others [(2009) 21 VST 60] 23. M/s GD
Goenka Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Goods
