petitioner/defendant No.9 filed an application-IA No.2
seeking amendment of his Written Statement. By the said
application, the petitioner/defendant ... reasons for the amendment, as set out by the
petitioner/defendant No.9 in his application, is to bring on
record the fact that late
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
SEZs are exempt from IGST and
the above matter was placed before 80th BoA meeting held on 17th
November, 2017. The BoA, after deliberations, approved ... same was accepted by the Department. The petitioners contend that the
amendment in question must be interpreted to operate prospectively, considering
well-established principles governing
