issued after the amendment of
Article 16 (4A) by the 85th Amendment, expressly recognizing that
seniority among Backward Classes/non-Backward Class candidates in
government ... dated 20 March 2003 has been issued in pursuance of the 85th
constitutional amendment by which the words “with consequential
seniority” were inserted in Clause
date will remain
15.3.2006 in view of implementation of 85th amendment to the
Constitution of India by the Government of Haryana ... date was
fixed as 15.3.2006 in view of the implementation of 85th
amendment to the Constitution of India by the Government of
Haryana
were unable
to justify their action of granting the benefit of 85th
Amendment Act of 2009 vide instructions dated
16.03.2006 being contrary to the judgment ... Court for grant of
accelerated seniority and promotion pursuant to the 85th
Constitutional Amendment to the reserved categories. In
8 of 12
::: Downloaded
belonging to the reserved categories were given the
benefit of the 85th Amendment of the Constitution of
Signature Not Verified
India. The writ petitioners sought
other connected cases
85th amendment to the Constitution of India by the
Government of Haryana on 16.3.2006.
Now, the instructions dated 16.3.2006, the base
2001-Estt.(D) dated 21/01/2002, issued pursuant to 85th Amendment
Act, 2001 .
Grounds for Second Appeal
The CPIO did not provide the desired
notification dated 27th January, 2005 issued on the basis of the
85th Constitutional amendment.
[2] It is not in dispute that the questions assailing
Dr. Jishri Laxmanrao Patil, Member, The ... vs The Chief Minister Of State Of ... on 27
Dilip Madhukar Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra Thru Chief ... on 27 June, 2019
Author
Shri. Sanjeet Shukla vs The State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors. And ... on 27 June
