though Rule 3(3)(1)(b) supra prior to its amendment w.e.f.
9th January, 2014 also mentioned six months training ... stood prior to its amendment with effect from
9th January, 2014 mentioned six months training and one year experience
but the institutions / individuals from which
symbol before the
commencement of the Prevention of Food Adulteration (9th
Amendment) Rules, 2001:
Provided also that the provisions of these rules shall not
apply
consonance with Rule 99.2 of
RPF Rules but the amendment vide letter dated 9th August, 2006 of
para ... also appearing for the respondents has
added that once the amendment vide letter dated 9th August, 2006 of para
applying r. 115 which has been further diluted by the IT (9th Amendment) Rules, 1993, coming into force w.e.f. 25th May, 1993, that
admittedly, the EMD submitted was short by 19
days upto the 9th amendment and 34 days up to the 10th amendment. It
is submitted that
stand extended to four years (48 months) from 9th
February 2007 and would expire on 9th February 2011.
8. Thereafter, on 1st November ... difficulty in allowing the Petitioner‟s request for amendment of the
priority date to 9th February 2007 which, although to the Petitioner‟s
detriment, would
well before the coming into force of the Hindu Succession
(Amendment) Act, 2005 , on 9th November, 1993. Having so died, she could
not have become ... 2012 Page 16 of 19
of the Amendment Act on 9th September, 2005 does not arise; the plaintiff
also has neither pleaded nor argued
This makes it necessary to refer to the amendment of the 2014
Regulations, made effective from 9th June, 2017, vide the National
Council for Teacher ... qualifications, which were
introduced later, by the 2017 Amendment Regulations, which came
into effect on 9th June, 2017.
35. Significantly, the 2017 Amendment Regulations
shall be necessary. "
The amended Rule 53 prior to its amendment on 9th September, 1988, unamended Rule 53(3), was as follows ... arguments advanced by the petitioners. What has been done by the amendment to sub-rule , Rule 53 is that instead of postponing the meeting
applied for
amendment of the plaint to plead registration of the
trademark. The said application for amendment was
allowed on 9th September, 2010. The defendant ... applied for
amendment of the plaint to add the relief on the ground
of infringement and which amendment was allowed on
9th September
