Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

applying r. 115 which has been further diluted by the IT (9th Amendment) Rules, 1993, coming into force w.e.f. 25th May, 1993, that

There was no estoppel against the statute and the amendment to the claim dated 9th May, 1947 was not in the nature of a fresh ... against the statute". 13. Regarding the position of the amendment of the 9th May 1947, Mr. Sinha has referred to Clause 25 of Exhibit

reject the said application in which the petitioners had prayed for amendment of their suit. They had also prayed for permission to join the Town ... rejected in the year 1985. They thereafter moved amendment application on 9th April 2003. By way of amendment the petitioners wanted essentially

petitioners did not set out the text of the proposed amendment. This amendment MVR,J CRP No. 950 of 2019 2 sought is very lengthy ... corrected. Another reason assigned in support of the proposed amendment is that the 9th respondent made certain alienations out of the plaint schedule properties

Therefore, the application came to be filed for amendment. The application was resisted by the 9th defendant alone, reiterating the averments made ... case. When the amendment sought is bonafide, refusing the amendment will lead to injustice and multiplicity of proceedings. The proposed amendment sought will not change

August, 2002 was title denied for the first time after the amendment of the plaint was moved, the relief of declaration claimed by the plaintiff ... since the amendment was allowed in the present case by the judgment dated 28th March, 2002, the said amendment related back to 9th March

earlier learned arbitrator Shri R.K. Bhansali on 9th June 2000. The said amendment was opposed by the petitioner by filing written statement before ... arbitrator had already allowed the amendment on 12th September 2008 itself, the question of keeping any hearing on 9th January 2009 did not arise. Learned

decree having thus been materially altered to her prejudice by the "amendment" Under Section 19 of the Act, she has. preferred this appeal ... calculated from the date of the amendment of the decree by the Court below on 9th November 1942, the appeal would be well within time

petition of the plaintiff, which was filed on the 9th August. 1965 was for amendment of the plaint and addition of certain alternative reliefs ... added since that stood time-barred on the 9th August, 1965 when the petition lor amendment of the plaint was filed. Learned Counsel contended that

Civil Application was allowed by the order dated 9th February, 2009 and the amendment to delete the name of Chandravati was carried out on 20th