amend the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 , be taken into consideration.”
DR. A. SAMPATH ( ATTINGAL ): Sir, I am on a point of order under Rule ... merits of the Bill. What is your point of order?
DR. A. SAMPATH : Sir, my point of order is that this is an unconstitutional Bill
that the Government will consider all my views. Thank you.
DR. A. SAMPATH ( ATTINGAL ): Mr. Deputy-Speaker, Sir, thank you.
16.47 hrs (Hon. Speaker ... also a Member in one of the Standing Committees.
Madam Speaker, I know you are in a hurry.
HON. SPEAKER: No.
DR. A. SAMPATH : Then
should not have delivered
a judgment as was delivered in the case of Keisham
Meghachandra Singh (supra) inasmuch as a Bench
comprising of two learned ... same issue to a larger Bench by an order dated 8th
13
November 2016 in the case of S.A. Sampath Kumar v. Kale
Yadaiah
fact, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court
dealing with a similar issue declined to pass any relief in
S.A. SAMPATH KUMAR V. KALE ... Disqualification Rules would not afford a ground for judicial
review."
In S.A. SAMPATH KUMAR 's case (5 supra), the Supreme
Court held
fact, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court
dealing with a similar issue declined to pass any relief in
S.A. SAMPATH KUMAR V. KALE ... Disqualification Rules would not afford a ground for judicial
review."
In S.A. SAMPATH KUMAR 's case (5 supra), the Supreme
Court held
fact, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court
dealing with a similar issue declined to pass any relief in
S.A. SAMPATH KUMAR V. KALE ... Disqualification Rules would not afford a ground for judicial
review."
In S.A. SAMPATH KUMAR 's case (5 supra), the Supreme
Court held
A-4, A-1 is the son of A-2 and A-4. A-3 is the son-in-law of A-2 and A ... a complaint (Ex. P-8) at the police station against A-1, A-2 and A-4. Therefore, A-1, A-2 and A
A Sampath Kumar vs The State Of Karnataka on 1 August, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:29911
WP NO.16643 ... INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO.16643 OF 2021 (LR)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. A. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE T. ASHWATHNARAYANAIAH
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
A.S.A.Sampath vs The Commissioner on 28 April, 2017
Author: V.Parthiban
Bench: V.Parthiban
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ... 15038 to 15040 of 2016
A.S.A.Sampath ..Petitioner
Vs
1.The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Administration) Department,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai
A.S.A.Sampath vs The Commissioner on 28 April, 2017
Author: V.Parthiban
Bench: V.Parthiban
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ... JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P(MD)No.21041 of 2016
A.S.A.Sampath ..Petitioner
Vs
1.The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Administration
