Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2077 (2.63 seconds)

Gurjinder Pal Singh vs Home Affairs on 30 April, 2024

received multiple commemorations and appreciation, especially in Naxal infested areas. The ACR/APAR of the applicant has mostly been '9' & above ... Inquiry Committee. 3.8 As a retaliatory measure against the applicant, his ACR/APAR for the assessment year 2019-20 was maliciously and arbitrarily downgraded from
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Satbir Singh vs M/O Power on 23 February, 2024

were granted to the applicant on the basis of his ACRs/APARs. In this regard, the applicant further states that (OA No.3283/2016 ... ACRS/APARs have either been Outstanding or Very Good since 2010, except for the period 01.04.2014 to 29.09.2014 and 30.09.2014 to 28.01.2015 which were graded
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohd Shahnvaj vs Dmrc on 17 April, 2025

these judgments is that any representation against the adverse entries of ACR/APAR has to be decided by an authority higher than the authority ... made entries in the ACR/APAR. xxx xxx xxx xxx Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the various judgments cited above
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kripal Singh vs Cpwd on 29 May, 2024

MACP yearly assessment from 2011 to 2015 due to below benchmark ACRs/ APARs The learned counsel submitted that 3rd financial upgradation ... ACR, he submits a representation against such remarks to the competent authority for upgradation. In the present case, the below benchmark ACRs/APARs were communicated
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next