under the DACPS does not arise.
He has submitted that, ACR/APAR is assessed under a different
scheme. The same has no manner of application ... competent authority that, the
petitioner was assessed for the ACR/APAR and that, the petitioner had
obtained only a 'Good' mark
Report (APAR) where he had secured only 'Good'. The ACRs/APARs
which were taken in to consideration for assessment in 2010 were ... applicant. Only in December, 2012 the respondents
communicated the ACRs/APARs and he was granted promotion vide
Annexure A8 order dated 30.5.2013 with effect from
thereby
indulged in mischief and fraud. Mischief and
fraud in the ACRs/APARs, in which the
culpability of the officer concerned is well borne ... ACR for the year 2007-08 has been
considered. The alleged irregularities committed by the
applicant in the writing of her ACR/APAR have never
these judgments is that any
representation against the adverse entries of ACR/APAR has to be
decided by an authority higher than the authority ... made
entries in the ACR/APAR. In light of these judgments, it is
submitted that the representation should have been decided at
the level
complaint received on : 26.05.2015
Information sought :
The appellant sought her final ACR/APAR grading for the period 2008 to 2015 along with
benchmark in ACR ... application has not been provided. She stated that her
ACR/APAR gradings have not been communicated to her because of which her promotion has
been
mark
5. According to the respondent, his last five years ACR/APARs has one
'Outstanding' and four 'Very Good', the pattern ... viva-voce. As per aforesaid
RTI reply, the assessement of the ACR/APARs of the respondent would be as follows:
One Outstanding - 5x1 = 5 marks
meanwhile, ordered a change in
the Reporting/Reviewing/Accepting pattern of ACRs/APARs of Group 'A'
Officers/Scientists, Group 'B' Officers ... been decided that the following pattern for
reporting/reviewing/accepting of ACRs/APARs in respect of Group
'A' Officers/Scientists, Group
taking
into consideration the valid points raised in the petition. The
ACR/APAR with adverse entry against the applicant should have been
communicated ... average' in the
ACR of the official below benchmark remark, required to be
communicated.
7. When the ACR/APARs of the applicant were verified
officers whose
CIC/YA/C/2014/000221/SB Page 1
ACR/APAR are not being written/reviewed by their immediate superior as per All India ... name and designation of the officials who
have written/reviewed the ACR/APAR of Joint Secretaries, Directors, Deputy Secretaries, Deputy
Registrar
ratio decided by the
Courts is that representation against adverse ACRs/APARs
should be decided by the authority higher than who have
recorded the ACR ... case the Member Engineer takes a favourable view
and upgrades these ACRs/APARs entries to 'bench mark' level,
the respondents shall consider
