strongly on a decision of the Supreme Court in Income-tax Officer. Alleppey v. M.C. Ponnoose . The question which arose in that case concerned ... regard the decision of the Supreme Court in Income-tax Officer, Alleppey v. M.C. Ponnoose . as an a fortiori case There the Court
said company and the management of William Goodacre and Sons Limited. Alleppey are closely interconnected. On September 4, 1982 Tac Floor Company gave a notice ... above said order, the management of William Goodacre and Sons Ltd., Alleppey filed Writ Appeal No. 225/1996 and the management of Tac Floor Company
Management of William Goodacre
& Sons Ltd., Alleppey and Anr., v. Neelakandan K. & Ors. ,], constitute res
judicata, the Labour Court, without considering their objections ... holding
that the judgment in Management of William Goodacre & Sons Ltd., Alleppey and
Anr., v. Neelakandan K. & Ors. , reported
said company and the Management of William Goodacre and Sons Limited. Alleppey are closely interconnected. On 4th September, 1982 Tac Floor Company gave a notice ... said above order, the Management of William Goodacre and Sons Ltd., Alleppey, filed Writ Appeal No. 225 of 1996 and the Management of Tac Floor
mother of the parties, namely,
Sarada Devi had immovable property in Alleppey. She sold it for valuable
consideration and out of the sale proceeds ... admitted in the written statement that immovable
property of Sarada Devi in Alleppey was sold and the suit property was
purchased
sales of laurel oil effected after 1st November, 1956, to dealers at Alleppey and other places situated in the Kerala State. The assessment in respect ... that he was not the last purchaser and that the purchasers at Alleppey and other places in the Kerala State should alone be treated
carrying on business in piece goods on wholesale and retail basis in Alleppey and two other places. In his books were found entries for expenses
that in the decision reported in AIR (37) 1950 Travancore-Cochin 103 (Alleppey Municipality v. Bombay Co.), dealing with Travancore District Municipalities Act XXIII
that in the decision reported in AIR (37) 1950 Travancore-Cochin 103 (ALLEPPEY MUNICIPALITY Vs. BOMBAY CO.), dealing with Travancore District Municipalities Act XXIII
agents then intimate their principals, viz., A. V. Thomas and Co. Ltd., Alleppey, with a branch at Calicut, to despatch the goods. The goods
