01125/2019 with a prayer to set-aside APAR grading
for the years 2017-18 and 2018-19 and to set-aside the order
rejecting ... request to ignore the APAR grading. In OA
No.170/00588/2021, the respondent approached the CAT with
a prayer to set-aside the order
01125/2019 with a prayer to set-aside APAR grading
for the years 2017-18 and 2018-19 and to set-aside the order
rejecting ... request to ignore the APAR grading. In OA
No.170/00588/2021, the respondent approached the CAT with
a prayer to set-aside the order
duties for reviewing of the APAR.
[14]. At this stage, it would be appropriate to stated the APAR
grading of the petitioner from ... stated supra,
except the grade for the period under report i.e., 2016-2017, the petitioner's
grading in APAR remained either "very
consistently graded as "Outstanding". However, for the period 01.04.2016 to
16.12.2016, petitioner was graded "Very Good" in his APAR. Being
aggrieved ... said DPC, in terms of
directions of this Court, petitioner‟s APAR grading the year 01.04.2018 to
31.03.2019 was considered as "Very Good
under progress.
Previously also, he appealed for revision of
his APAR grading. But the same have been
rejected by the Appellate Authority.
Similarly, the complainant ... under progress. Previously also, he
appealed for revision of his APAR grading.
But the same have been rejected by the
appellate authority
written in two parts with different final Gradings but his overall
final Grading in the APAR for the entire year : 2012-2013 was "Very ... written in two parts with different final
gradings his overall final grading for the entire 2012-13 APAR will be "Very
Good" Shri
petitioner is aggrieved of his APAR grading for the years
2012-13 and 2013-14. The petitioner alleges mala fide against the
respondent ... APAR for the relevant period.
8. She submits, by referring to the APAR for the other period, that
the petitioner has almost consistently been graded
review and
upgradation of his APAR, who vide the Order dated 22.05.2019,
upgraded the APAR grading from „3.1‟ to „6.0‟ for the year ... recording the adverse
remarks and below benchmark grading, therefore, the adverse
remarks/grading in the impugned APAR deserves to be set aside.
44. In view
Senior Management Grade Scale IV to which grade he was
promoted on 24-12-2009. Next promotion due is to Senior
Management Grade Scale ... remarks recorded in his APAR and provided
counseling. Since petitioner secured more than 40% marks based on
his APAR gradings, his APAR remarks were
appointment as an FTE-2, subject to the condition that his
APAR grading is 85% average or above ... obvious from the above that the petitioner did
possess the APAR grading of over 85% as intimated to the
petitioner under the communication dated
