duties for reviewing of the APAR.
[14]. At this stage, it would be appropriate to stated the APAR
grading of the petitioner from ... stated supra,
except the grade for the period under report i.e., 2016-2017, the petitioner's
grading in APAR remained either "very
Merit Promotion Scheme is assessed on the basis of the APAR grading of
the employee, during the prescribed eligibility period, his domain knowledge, his
record ... four A-2 grading, 8 years with four A-3 grading and 9 years with four B+
grading. The six years APAR gradings from
downgrading APARs sans issuing any memo. The sa
same has
been rejected. Being
Being aggrieved by the APAR grading ... awarding Grade-4,
which is less than the previous year grade. No memo was issued while
down grading the APAR grades.
10 OA No.1125
officer satisfied the yardstick viz bench mark grading, vigilance clearance,
APAR grading etc as per posting policy in vogue. The applicant's
promotion order ... with at least 4 years residual service and having
last 5 APAR grading minimum very good shall also be considered for
posting
applicant submitted a representation dated 24.5.2010 against the below benchmark gradings in his APAR for the periods ... does not give specific reasons for upgrading the below benchmark ACR/APAR gradings at par with the benchmark for next promotion.
3. All Ministries / Departments
applicant. It is prerogative of the Reporting
Officer to record the grading in APAR according
to the performance of the applicant for a
particular period ... natural justice. In fact grading Just
Adequate which is below the benchmark grading
Good and above the grading Poor which is in
fact adverse report
vide which his
representation dated 20.6.2019 for rectifying the APAR grades
assigned by the Reviewing Officer for the year 2017, has been rejected.
b) Direct ... order dated
30.9.2019, in which his request for rectification of APAR grades assigned
to him by the Reviewing officer for the year 2017, has been
records/APAR are very good/good. But the
APAR/ACR for the year 2013-14 is an exception which has been down-
graded and declared ... applicant is that the grading of 3.5 (or effectively a grading of zero) in
his APAR for the year 2013 -2014 is unjustified
promotion from Junior Administrative
Grade (in short, "JAG") to Senior Administrative Grade (in
short, "SAG"). The details of respondent ... Year Overall As per Numeric part (IV o
grading the APAR, grading with 6
and short of 8 will be rated
as 'very good
Annual Performance Assessment Report (APAR) for the period 1.04.2008 to 31.03.2009. In the said APAR, the applicant was graded as only `good by the reporting ... graded as `good by the reporting officer Mr. Tiwari but the reviewing authority had changed this grading to `very good, recording that the grading
