directed the Senior Prosecuting Officer (SPO) to take the necessary steps. The APO posted in the Court of the CJM, Varanasi, thereafter, moved an application ... learned CJM was pleased to reject the application of the APO dated 4.8.1999 for want of sufficient grounds. It has been observed in the order
working as Assistant Public Prosecutors/Assistant Prosecuting Officers (for short "APP/APOs"), seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to allow them ... filed by Bhanu Pratap Pandey and 42 others who are working as APO/APP in various districts of the State of U.P., assailing
District Magistrate communicated the aforesaid permission, through proper channel to the learned APO in charge of prosecution case against the accused-opposite party ... then learned ACJM Ist, Meerut and finally, on 07.05.2010, learned APO moved his application seeking withdrawal of prosecution. Against the above said withdrawal application
dated 27.11.2015 for the post of Assistant Prosecution Officer ( in short "APO"), which is not according to the Reservation Policy enclosed as Annexure ... petitioner as selected in the Preliminary Examination on the post of APO by giving benefit of Handicapped Category (both legs) against the Advertisement dated
present at his 9 Jaat Regiment C Company C/o 99 APO in Gurdaspur, Punjab. He further denied the suggestion that he had nominated ... present at his 9 Jaat Regiment C Company C/o 99 APO and did not participate in the incident at all, however, he has been
resident of 71 Sub Area Provost Unit, C/o. 56 APO. None of the respondents have their office in Uttar Pradesh. In para ... posted at 340 (I) Mechanised Brigade Provost Unit. C/o. 56, APO (at Nasirabad) w.e.f. 15,7.2003.
7. In paragraph
submitted that the applicant is an contractual Assistant Programme Officer (in short APO) and thus he is not a public servant. The only allegation against ... authorization. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the the work of APO is only monitoring of information and the APO cannot give any financial
Charges 1 to 4 in the charge sheet, evidence of CW-6 APO was also recorded, who is supposed to have examined the constables/pairokars ... given statements in all the cases on the dictation of APO and his statements were genuine and believable.
Similarly, CW-5 Constable Rajesh Kumar
appellant for securing the fraudulent appointment letter duly signed by the said APO (Const.) was proved is, in the light of the above discussion, erroneous
mortgage suit as in Jowad Hussain v. Gendan Singh , 53 Ind Apo 197 : AIR 1926 PC 93. But as pointed out by Sir Lawrence Jenkins
