investigation was assigned to SFIO and an officer of SFIO was appointed as
an Inspector under the Act; in the meanwhile, a creditor ... that the officer
appointed under Section 212 is the officer appointed by the Director of SFIO
and not by the Central Government directly
appointed to take
possession of the assets, properties and bank account of the applicant company.
Such Special Officer on appointment of the SFIO ... such appointment to the Special Officer and the parties.
The order of injunction passed shall also remain operative till the
appointment of SFIO
requests for the following reliefs:-
"1. Discharge of Provisional Liquidator;
2. SFIO order dated 08.11.2016 be set aside;
3. Stay of all the proceedings ... being OLR 286/2016 had made the following observations while
appointing SFIO to enquire into the accounts of the respondent
company:-
"5. Mr. Mayank
Serious Fraud Investigation Office („SFIO‟),
vide order F. No. 5/5/2016/CL-II dated 03.05.2016.
3. The Director, SFIO, appointed officers of the SFIO
respondent no. 2/Serious Fraud Investigation Office (‗SFIO'),
appointed/notified a team of inspectors to carry out the investigation.
iii. During the course ... affairs
of the company for which he is appointed.‖
3.1. Learned Senior Counsel submitted that the SFIO can carry out an
investigation only pursuant
designated by Director,
SFIO.
4. The Inspectors appointed by Director, SFIO to investigate into
the affairs of the above mentioned company, shall exercise ... Birla
Shloka Edutech Limited and Zenith Birla Limited by the SFIO.
The Inspectors appointed by Director, SFIO, are directed
to investigate into its affairs
recommended for investigation by Serious Fraud Investigation Office
( hereinafter referred to as “SFIO”) by a letter dated 24.04.2012. Again it was
challenged by the Company ... inspection report, Government of India ordered for investigation
by appointing SFIO by its communication dated 23.07.2010 itself. Though,
the order of investigation was challenged before
recommended for investigation by Serious Fraud Investigation Office
( hereinafter referred to as “SFIO”) by a letter dated 24.04.2012. Again it was
challenged by the Company ... inspection report, Government of India ordered for investigation
by appointing SFIO by its communication dated 23.07.2010 itself.
22. He further contended that though, the order
recommended for investigation by Serious Fraud Investigation Office
( hereinafter referred to as “SFIO”) by a letter dated 24.04.2012. Again it was
challenged by the Company ... inspection report, Government of India ordered for investigation
by appointing SFIO by its communication dated 23.07.2010 itself. Though,
the order of investigation was challenged before
SFIO) to investigate the affairs
of petitioner no.1 company. In addition, the petitioners also impugn an
order dated 14.12.2012 issued by the SFIO appointing
