passed by the
Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2 nd Court, Asansol, in Sessions Trial No.
28 of 2016 arising out of Sessions Serial Case ... senseless being
burnt. Immediately she was shifted to by her husband to Asansol Government
Hospital and the complainant was informed. After the complainant reached
there
District - Aurangabad, Presently residing at
Village - Old 40 Unit, P.S. - North Asansol, District - Bardhaman (West
Bengal).
2. Tammana Khatoon W/O Ainul Khan @ Ainullah ... District - Aurangabad, Presently residing at Village -
Old 40 Unit, P.S. - North Asansol, District - Bardhaman (West Bengal).
3. Samim Khan Son of Ainul Khan @ Ainullah
been facing trial before the learned Additional Sessions
Judge, 3rd Court, Asansol.
While the petitioner was in judicial custody, he was placed under
suspension with ... January 22, 2015,
passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Asansol and
the order of the competent authority, as mentioned in the order
Kumar on seizure list,
Ext. 4 is order of S.D.M, Asansol No. 1455 dated 16.10.2002, Ext.
2/3 is Inquest Report ... stated
that on 05.10.2002, he was posted as Executive Magistrate at
Asansol and for compliance of order of S.D.M (Ext.4) he along
informs us that the State has engaged one Assistant Public Prosecutor from Asansol to conduct the case before the Sessions Judge, Purulia. It thus appears
passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast
Track 1st Court, Asansol in Sessions Trial No.18 of 2003 arising out of
Sessions Case ... poured kerosene oil and set her on fire.
She was admitted to Asansol S.D. Hospital. At the time of admission,
she was examined
under Section
438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with
Asansol (South) Police Station Case No. 318 of 2020 dated
06.10.2020 under Sections
passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court,
Asansol, Burdwan in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2013 arising out of Sessions Case ... Sessions and transferred to the Court of Additional
Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Asansol, Bardhaman, for trial and disposal. Charge
was framed against the appellant under
