Yadav vs Executive Committee Of Asrtu & Ors. on 21 May, 2015
B. P. S. Yadav Vs Executive Committee of ASRTU ... Page 1 of 6
B. P. S. Yadav Vs Executive Committee of ASRTU & Ors.
1. This is a suit for declaration and mandatory injunction
2005, the plaintiff
was at Sr. No.8. Vide order No.ASRTU/ADMN./5162, Dated:
31/10/2005, her junior Sh.Naresh Kumar was promoted ... defendant
had not given any reasonable reply. Again vide order
No.ASRTU/ADMN./0185/047, dated: 30/07/2010, one Mukesh
Kumar Sharma Sr. Asstt
demand drafts drawn in favour of Seimens Video Automatic Ltd.,
Executive Director ASRTU and Executive Director ASRTU respectively.
14. CW -1 further deposed that ... accused. The complainant has allegedly made
payments to Seimens Video and ASRTU, but not proximity or connection with accused
has been shown. The complainant could
demand drafts drawn in favour of Seimens Video Automatic Ltd.,
Executive Director ASRTU and Executive Director ASRTU respectively.
14. CW -1 further deposed that ... accused. The complainant has allegedly made
payments to Seimens Video and ASRTU, but not proximity or connection with accused
has been shown. The complainant could
contract with the Association of the State
Road Transport Undertakings in brief ASRTU for the
supply of spring assembly and spring leaves during the
period ... various members
of ASRTU. It is also agreed that pursuant to the
contract, the plaintiff placed an order bearing purchase
no. 27609 dated
State Road Transport Undertakings
Through its Executive Director
2. Executive Director, ASRTU
Office at:
ASRTU Bhawan,
Plot No. 4A, PSP Block,
Pocket 14, Sector ... deputation basis'. It is the case of plaintiff
that ASRTU/CIRT Employees Recruitment Regulations, 1992
(hereinafter referred to as Recruitment Regulations) provides for
appointment
6.1998. Ld. Counsel Further Argued That ... vs Union Of India (1988) 1 Scc on 1
