opposite party authorities. In
5
fact, Ext-A/1 suggests the absentee statement of the petitioner with
effect from January 1999 till 23.07.1999 whereas
without considering the vital
documents of biometric attendance system and monthly absentee
statement of immediate superior. As regards granting him opportunity
of being heard
absentee today. The absentee
reiterated what she had said in the earlier interaction i.e., that she wants to
go with the petitioner. The absentee ... absentee [statement dated 22.02.2023] to the
same effect and a Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement given by the absentee
before the Jurisdictional Magistrate
Officer of Divisional
Personnel Office, Palakad and for production of the absentees statement for the
period commencing from 09.12.2011 to 12.08.2012 in respect ... petitioner's Advocate has advised the petitioner that
the absentees statement for the period from 09.12.2011 to 12.08.2012 in respect
of the respondent/accused
given
to the Head Pandit of the School to submit the absentee
statement of the concerned employees at the time for preparation
of bills
post of In-charge Executive Engineer but in the absentee
statement prepared by the respondents, the petitioner has been shown as
Daily Wages Assistant Engineer
Erpula Rama Krishna vs Purighalla Sri Charandas Goswami on 3 June, 2019
Bench: V.Ramasubramanian
Baggani Vinay Kumar vs The State Of Telangana on 3 June, 2019
Bench: V.Ramasubramanian
Komanpally Rajender vs The State Of Telangana on 3 June, 2019
Bench: V.Ramasubramanian , P
Chamanthula Raju vs V Ramachandra Reddy on 3 June, 2019
Bench: V.Ramasubramanian , P. Keshava