Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.78 seconds)

G Dali Dora vs M/O Railways on 13 July, 2023

respondents contested the OA by filing a reply statement. They have stated that the initial appointment of the applicant was on 05.05.1999. After completion ... several punishments were imposed on him due to his frequent unauthorized absenteeism. While he was working at Simhachalam North, he was allotted a Railway quarter
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. M. Agneesu vs Uoi on 29 December, 2008

dated 30.04.1979. 3. The respondents have filed reply statement in which they have stated that the applicant's husband while working as Sr. Gate ... respondents, ex-employee Sri M. Nageswara Rao was a habitual absentee. During the financial years 1993-94 he was absent for 234 days
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Yasmeen vs South Central Railway on 10 September, 2024

heart attack etc., of his mother. He is simply making a defensive statement. If he was himself not well or hospitalized etc., it is possible ... concluding the modified penalty order. The Ex-employee was a habitual absentee unauthorisedly as per the historical records as presented by the respondents
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next