petitioner is highly disproportionate to the admitted guilt of supplying
absentee statement to one of the employees particularly when the
petitioner, in his long, devoted ... adverse entries/remarks. The charge in that case was
supplying absentee statement to one of the employees, which was neither
confidential or a privileged document
records.
b. Submission of periodical statement of routine nature
like absentee statement etc.,
c. Preparation and submission of indents with the
approval of supervisor
irrational and disproportionate for the alleged misconduct of unauthorised absence and habitual absenteeism. It is the applicant's case that in regard to unauthorised ... that he was guilty of habitual absenteeism. He submitted his defence statement on 10.1.1996, but before the enquiry could commence he was transferred
part.
8. The respondents filed additional reply statement stating that
he is a habitual absentee. Various spells of his absence from 19.08.2006
to 18.07.2018 have
counsel, the applicant has
been a habitual absentee and details have all been given in the
reply statement to the rejoinder. There have been complaints
Conduct Rules. Even though habitual absenteeism is stated in the
penalty advice, there is no such allegation in the charge memo. Moreover, the
action ... reply statement on 12.01.2022
more or less in line with the earlier reply. It is further stated that the applicant
is a habitual absentee, details
Conduct Rules. Even though habitual absenteeism is stated in the
penalty advice, there is no such allegation in the charge memo. Moreover, the
action ... reply statement on 12.01.2022
more or less in line with the earlier reply. It is further stated that the applicant
is a habitual absentee, details
reply statement that the applicant was never
engaged as a casual labourer and was only employed as a substitute against
absentees.
5. Heard Ms.Shobha
applicant's next junior was put to perform duties of the absentee. When the applicant resumed duty as HSA on expiry of leave ... also contradicted the various averments made by 4th respondent in the reply statement.
6. An additional reply statement was filed by Respondents
Posts
letter dated 17.05.1989 'Substitutes' engaged against absentees do not come
under the category of casual labourers. The applicant had been engaged ... detailed in the list
produced at paragraph 2 of the reply statement. Her engagement was in
accordance with the provisions of GDS (Conduct & Engagement
