examination was being
conducted, the respondent was required to submit
the absentees statement in Form-A, but he did not
submit the same within ... afternoon session on 21.07.2004 but, he did not submit
the absentee statement event at 4.45 p.m. on the other
hand behaved rudely and arrogantly
examination was
being conducted, the respondent was required to submit
the absentees statement in Form-A, but he did not
submit the same within
reiterating the contentions raised in the
statement of objections. He would contend that
petitioner was a regular absentee and out of total
number
this case, curiously, the management respondent filed an 'additional objections statement' stating that the appellant was appointed on a temporary basis ... following acts of misconduct are referred to.-
(i) Absenteeism on 4-4-1992.
(ii) Absenteeism from 17-8-1992 to 28-9-1992.
(iii) Negligence
reiterating the contentions raised in the
statement of objections. He would contend that
petitioner was a regular absentee and out of total
number
course of
investigation have recorded further statement of the
complainant and other witnesses. The complainant has
given statements on different dates ... petitioner - accused in the FIR and the statement on
10.09.2017 i.e., he is the absentee abettor, but there is no
material to show that
edifice on the basis of a statement made in the written
statement that the respondent was a habitual absentee during
his short period of service ... edifice on the basis of a statement made in
the written statement that the respondent was a habitual
absentee during his short period of service
further contended that the workman has made
contradictory statements with regard to his absenteeism, and
that the award of the Labour Court tantamounts to treating ... averments made in the
petition and the counter statement, the petitioner was
working as Fitter Coolie in the Water Supply Department
and he served
material placed before it, dismissed the workman from
service.
3. The claim statement was filed by the workman
under Section ... date of reinstatement. The corporation filed counter
statement, iter alia, contending that the workman was a
habitual absentee and the disciplinary authority,
considering that
submitted
that the work in the Bank was hampered and
absenteeism of the petitioner affected the business and
service of the second respondent-Bank. Therefore ... that absenteeism
was due to health issues. In the absence of any material
to establish that absenteeism was due to health issues,
mere statement
