order dated
17.11.2005.
Thus, from the statement of DW1, it is evident that the
appellant was habitual absentee,
In the present case, there ... inquiry. Further from the statement of DW1, it is evident that the
appellant was a habitual absentee. It is evident that the impugned
order
dismissed vide order dated 10.7.1995 being time barred.
Defendants, in their written statement, averred that
the respondent-plaintiff joined as a Constable with Punjab Armed ... Police on 14.12.1990. It was further averred that respondent was
a habitual absentee and had been awarded punishment in this
regard on number of occasions
statement, which has been so recorded by the District Collector at pages 44-45
of the paper book. In fact, this false and misleading statement ... Abohar, he would be an absentee Lambardar.
Referring to the averments taken in para 3 of the written statement,
learned counsel for respondent
their written statement,
averred that the petitioner was working as Casual Operator with
them with effect from 3.2.2001. Petitioner was a habitual absentee.
Petitioner
petitioner were not proved on account of inconsistency in the statements
of witnesses of the department. Petitioner, thereafter, was issued a show
cause notice dated ... Panchkula and the matter was sub-
judice. She was a habitual absentee and had misbehaved with MD, HPGCL,
Panchkula on 19.07.2005. The punishing authority
absentee having been charged with 5 major and 9 minor
punishments. The details of the punishments were incorporated in
paragraph 2 of the written statement
with the principles of natural
justice and Rules.
Defendants in their written statement averred
that the appellant was dismissed from service as he had
remained ... without leave. It was further
averred that the appellant was a habitual absentee.
Appellant was placed under suspension vide order dated
10.04.2001 and had failed
dated 7th October, 2015, the petitioner asserts that she was not an
absentee candidate, but had appeared before the Committee for counselling on
18th December ... seeking reservation in Punjab as a reserved
category candidate.
In the written statement filed by the Department, it has been
alluded that directions were issued
Neetu Bala vs Union Of India And Others on 1 February, 2016
Author: Harinder Singh
Sarbjeet Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 30 March, 2016
Author: G.S
