Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.08 seconds)

Sobhana Kumari vs M/O Railways on 27 June, 2018

delayed payment. .5. 6. Per contra, the respondents have filed a reply statement refuting the claim of the applicant. It is reiterated that ... years which establishes the fact that he was a habitual absentee. In compliance with the directions issued by this Tribunal and confirmed
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dilip Mehta vs Railway on 30 May, 2018

harass the applicant after his retirement. 3. The respondents, through their written statement, have denied the claims of the applicant. They have further stated that ... fixation of his pay after taking into account the absentee period, the overpayment of Rs. 1,69738 /- remained outstanding against the applicant. This outstanding amount
Central Administrative Tribunal - Patna Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manoj vs Comm. Of Police on 12 December, 2018

also remained absent for 639 days and during the said absentee period, absentee notices were issued and earlier also he remained absent wilfully and unauthorizedly ... different occasions. 4. Along with the article of charge, statement of imputation of misconduct, list of documents and list of witnesses were furnished
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1