therefore, the punishment was proportionate to the
charges. In the counter statement dated 31.03.2000 filed before the Labour
Court, the respondent Corporation had referred ... himself and stated that the petitioner was an
habitual absentee. As per the counter statement, the petitioner had
http://www.judis.nic.inabsented himself from
Labour Court also revealed that the 2nd respondent workman was a
habitual absentee on several occasions and all these facts and
details were also placed ... recorded for the purpose of granting the relief. Contrarily, a
blanket statement was made for the purpose of setting aside the
order of dismissal
petitioner
has issued number of memos to the second respondent for unauthorized
absenteeism and for less production and imposed punishment of
suspension for two days ... various contentions in
the claim statement and petitioner denied the same and raised various
contentions in the counter statement. Before the first respondent, the
second
statement of
absence produced by the Management as stated above, this Court
is of an opinion that the 2nd respondent was a habitual absentee
Dravida Munnetara Kazhagam vs The Union Of India on 22 October, 2019
Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
allegation that petitioner is habitual
http://www.judis.nic.in
8
absentee. In view of the same, the first respondent has not properly
exercised ... leave, only the Branch Manager has power to grant leave. This
statement was not disputed by the petitioner. The witnesses stated that
if employee
R.Ravikumar vs The Government Of India on 15 November, 2019
Author: M.Sundar
Bench
Dravida Munnetara Kazhagam vs The Union Of India on 22 October, 2019
Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
G.Balasundaram ... Review vs The Secretary on 24 September, 2019
Bench: S.Manikumar , V.Bhavani
The Management vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour on 26 November, 2019
Author: S.M
