order dated
17.11.2005.
Thus, from the statement of DW1, it is evident that the
appellant was habitual absentee,
In the present case, there ... inquiry. Further from the statement of DW1, it is evident that the
appellant was a habitual absentee. It is evident that the impugned
order
their written statement, averred that the
plaintiff had joined as a Constable at Jalandhar on 29.4.1986.
Plaintiff was a habitual absentee. One year approved service
dismissed vide order dated 10.7.1995 being time barred.
Defendants, in their written statement, averred that
the respondent-plaintiff joined as a Constable with Punjab Armed ... Police on 14.12.1990. It was further averred that respondent was
a habitual absentee and had been awarded punishment in this
regard on number of occasions
their written statement,
averred that the petitioner was working as Casual Operator with
them with effect from 3.2.2001. Petitioner was a habitual absentee.
Petitioner
enquiry.
Defendants, in their written statement, averred that the
plaintiff had not completed his probation period and was discharged
on 17.8.1983 as he was unlikely ... prove to be an efficient police
officer. The plaintiff was a habitual absentee. No reasons were
required to be given at the time of passing
opposed by the defendants/appellants by taking
preliminary objections in the written statement to the effect that
suit was not maintainable; that the plaintiff ... suit. On
merits it was submitted that the plaintiff was a habitual absentee
and previously also he remained absent from duty on so many
occasions
been afforded due opportunity to present his case.
Defendants, in their written statement, averred that the
plaintiff had been asked to report for duty vide ... plaintiff, the impugned order was passed. The plaintiff was a habitual
absentee as detailed below:-
"i) Absented himself without leave for 16 days
suit was contested by the defendants by filing the joint
written statement taking preliminary objections regarding
maintainability; locus standi; estoppel; inadequate court fees and
that ... according to the wishes of Transport
Incharge. Being a habitual absentee, his leave was rightly
sanctioned as without pay from 7.3.1988 to 30.3.1988; that
plaintiff
defendants, in their written statement, averred that
the suit filed by the plaintiff was time barred. The plaintiff was
appointed as SPO on daily wage ... basis. He was a habitual absentee
and had neither been selected nor recruited as a Constable. Since
the plaintiff was working on daily wage basis
with the principles of natural
justice and Rules.
Defendants in their written statement averred
that the appellant was dismissed from service as he had
remained ... without leave. It was further
averred that the appellant was a habitual absentee.
Appellant was placed under suspension vide order dated
10.04.2001 and had failed
