principles of natural justice is necessary thereunder.
21. Existence of mens rea or actus reus to contravene a statutory
provision must also be held ... necessary that it should be proved that there was a mens rea or actus reus to
contravene the statutory provision by the employer
principles of natural justice is necessary thereunder.
21. Existence of mens rea or actus reus to contravene a statutory provision must also be held ... principles of natural justice is necessary thereunder.
21. Existence of mens rea or actus reus to contravene a statutory provision must also be held
principles of natural justice is
necessary thereunder.
21. Existence of mens rea or actus reus to contravene a statutory
provision must also be held ... view that in the absence of a finding
regarding mens rea/actus reus on the part of the employer, action
under Section
will be only logical that “mens rea” or “actus
reus” was prevailing at the relevant point of time and hence the order
passed ... rea is held to be necessary before
imposing penalty under Income Tax Act ), it was held that the existence of
mens rea or actus reus
himself as regards the
grounds, and identifies the existence of mens rea or actus reus,
damages ought not to be levied on the petitioner ... grounds for levy of damages or the existence of any mens
rea or actus reus, for the said respondent to invoke the provisions of
section
Court
was pleased to observe that :
"The existence of mens rea/actus reus to contravene a
statutory provision must also be held ... taken a
view in the absence of a finding regarding mens rea/actus reus on
the part of the employer, action under Section
Court
was pleased to observe that :
"The existence of mens rea/actus reus to contravene a
statutory provision must also be held ... taken a
view in the absence of a finding regarding mens rea/actus reus on
the part of the employer, action under Section
confirming the
levy of damages though there was no mens rea or actus reus
on the part of the appellant?
c) Whether the respondent could ... respondent. Further, the learned counsel
submitted that there was no mens rea or actus reus on the part of the
appellant, in such case
confirming the
levy of damages though there was no mens rea or actus reus
on the part of the appellant?
c) Whether the respondent could ... respondent. Further, the learned counsel
submitted that there was no mens rea or actus reus on the part of the
appellant, in such case
under Section 140-B of the Act of 1952 regarding
mens rea/actus reus on the part of the petitioner/employer,
therefore, the impugned order ... settled that in absence of finding regarding mens rea/actus
reus on the part of the employer, action under Section
