that in Jammu and Kashmir would have sought sanction for
prosecution under AFSPA, particularly in cases invloving allegations of
human rights violations, against SSB personnel ... must specifically clarify that no requests for sanction
for prosecution under AFSPA had been sought by the Government of
Jammu & Kashmir, particularly in cases
declared a disturbed area under the Armed Forces
(Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) at the relevant time. Considering the apparently
conflicting interests of human rights violation
declared a disturbed area under the Armed Forces
(Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) at the relevant time. Considering the apparently
conflicting interests of human rights violation
declared a disturbed area under the Armed Forces (Special Powers)
Act (AFSPA) at the relevant time. Considering the apparently conflicting
interests of human rights violation
Narain Aggarwal,
New Delhi. 1, Shankaracharya Marg,
Civil Lines, Delhi-110054.
PAN: AFSPA 9406 M
( Appellant ) ( Respondent )
Appellant by : Shri Gunjan Prasad CIT (DR)
Respondent
Rajya Sabha. Further, as understood from the provisions of the AFSPA, 1990, the
authority competent to make a decision on requests for sanction for prosecution
controlling ministry for Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) policies and
violations. In support of his contention, he referred to his written submission
dated ... State Government of J&K from
the MHA/MOD under AFSPA. He also prayed for conversion of the instant
Complaint into a Second Appeal
declared a disturbed area under the Armed Forces
(Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) at the relevant time. Considering the apparently
conflicting interests of human rights violation
declared a disturbed area under the Armed Forces
(Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) at the relevant time. Considering the apparently
conflicting interests of human rights violation
declared a disturbed area under the Armed Forces
(Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) at the relevant time. Considering the apparently
conflicting interests of human rights violation
