title of the petitioner and also contended
that the schedule property is not Wakf property and it is not at all
mentioned in the Gazette ... property attached to
Takia Kabir Ali Shah; that sale or alienation of Wakf property is
illegal and the sale deed document No.2672
over the suit
schedule property. It is contended that the suit schedule property is
part and parcel of Wakf property, which was notified; that ... first
respondent on 24.06.2003. It is contended that alienation of Wakf
property is void and that orders were passed under sub-Section (3) of
Section
property covered by the document
presented by the petitioner partakes the nature of a wakf property and
therefore, there can be no alienation thereof
Wakf Board is
claiming the same as Wakf land and they served a letter on the
Registering Authority not to register the deeds of alienation ... other transaction in respect of the said property. On 09.01.2018,
Tahsildar informed the Revenue Divisional Officer, in response to
the representation made by the petitioners
Wakf property. It was contended
that the suit property was never a Wakf or was claimed to be a Wakf
property and the plea ... created by the
1st respondent in collusion with the Officials of the Wakf Board and
also the photo copy of Extract of Book of Endowment
suit
schedule property; and also for another perpetual injunction
restraining the petitioners from alienating or transferring the suit
schedule property or part thereof ... name of Qutub Shahi Mosque. He denied that
the property was constituted as a wakf. He contended that Survey
Commissioner's report submitted along
raised as to how far the plaint schedule
property is a Wakf property if at all a civil Court has no jurisdiction much
less ... damages for use and
occupation as the case may be till the property is delivered back.
Having regard to the above, as there
Hills, Hyderabad and bounded by :
East : Neighbour's property
South : Temple property
West : Main Road
North : Part of House belonging to Devi Prasad ... also stated that the respondent made attempts to
encroach and alienate the property belonging to the 2nd petitioner-
Temple; and the 1st petitioner then issued
