pillion-
rider, as the insurance policy was a statutory
policy, and hence it did not cover the risk of
death of or bodily injury ... covered.
In such cases where the policy is not merely a
statutory policy, the terms of the policy have to be
considered to determine
pillion-
rider, as the insurance policy was a statutory
policy, and hence it did not cover the risk of
death of or bodily injury ... covered.
In such cases where the policy is not merely a
statutory policy, the terms of the policy have to be
considered to determine
insurance policy according to which it
is an 'Act Only Policy' and only the third party risk is covered.
The Tribunal ... pillion rider, as the
insurance policy was a statutory policy, and hence it did not
cover the risk of death of or bodily injury
insurance policy according to which it
is an 'Act Only Policy' and only the third party risk is covered.
The Tribunal ... pillion rider, as the
insurance policy was a statutory policy, and hence it did not
cover the risk of death of or bodily injury
insurance policy issued is Contractor's Plant and Machinery
Insurance Policy and it is not Motor Vehicle Insurance
Policy. Therefore, the risk of third ... Plant and Machinery Policy (CPM Policy).
Therefore, under these circumstances, when policy issued
is CPM Policy, third party risk is covered
which was
meant for agricultural purposes. It was a package policy where
the risk of the passengers are not covered ... irrespective of, the
policy being an Act policy in terms of Section 147 pertaining to
compulsory coverage of risks of third parties and other classes
Insurance Policy
is "Act Policy/liability only policy". Therefore, when the
Insurance Policy is an Act Policy/liability only policy, the risk ... involved in the present case that the insurance
policy is Act Policy / liability only policy, the risk of the claimant
being employee is covered only
considered the distinction between the 'Act Policy' and
'comprehensive Policy/package policy'. The Apex Court
also observed that in an earlier ... fine print of the policy. If the buyer of the policy has
options to make the policy cover in various aspects, then it
could have
considered the distinction between the 'Act Policy' and
'comprehensive Policy/package policy'. The Apex Court
also observed that in an earlier ... fine print of the policy. If the buyer of the policy has
options to make the policy cover in various aspects, then it
could have
insurance policy is a package policy and also
premium is paid for covering the risk of one driver and the
claimant is only the driver ... policy/liability only policy and comprehensive/package
policy. What section 147 of MV Act reflects is requirement
of policy means compulsorily coverage of risks under