Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4789 (0.02 seconds)

Ms Acc Limited vs Ce & Cgst Allahabad on 20 May, 2025

clarificatory amendment as there is nothing to suggest in the Amending Act that amendment made in Explanation 2 was clarificatory in nature. Wherever the Legislature ... clarificatory amendment as there is nothing to suggest in the Amending Act that amendment made in Explanation 2 was clarificatory in nature. Wherever the Legislature
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ceat Ltd. vs Mumbai-Iii on 16 June, 2025

same was not permissible in view of the retrospective amendment made in the Finance Act, 2004 . 2.7 Since in the present case, the duty payment ... available for utilization towards payment of CENVAT duty. Suitable amendment is being made to section 88 of the Finance
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cgst Varanasi vs Ms Gallant Ispat Ltd on 21 November, 2024

clarificatory amendment as there is nothing to suggest in the Amending Act that amendment made in Explanation 2 was clarificatory in nature. Wherever the Legislature ... clarificatory amendment as there is nothing to suggest in the Amending Act that amendment made in Explanation 2 was clarificatory in nature. Wherever the Legislature
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Hindustan Zinc Ltd vs Cce, Jaipur on 4 March, 2014

other services have been listed therein. This finds support from the amendment made in the definition of input service vide notification no.03/2011 ... Tribunal-LB), wherein the Tribunal while examining the scope of the amendment made in the definition of input by insertion of Explanation II to Rule
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 60 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next