First Schedule. Are you moving your amendments?
PROF. SAUGATA ROY ( DUM DUM ): Madam Speaker, I am not moving amendment ... vote of the House.
The amendment was put and negatived.
HON. SPEAKER: I shall now put Amendment No. 33 moved by Prof. Saugata
First Schedule. Are you moving your amendments?
PROF. SAUGATA ROY ( DUM DUM ): Madam Speaker, I am not moving amendment ... vote of the House.
The amendment was put and negatived.
HON. SPEAKER: I shall now put Amendment No. 33 moved by Prof. Saugata
workers? Are we creating slavery in industry and service sector?
Sir, moving the amendment Bill, the hon. Minister of State for Labour and Employment assured ... joined this nationwide strike. It is because the Government is moving the Labour Laws Amendment Bill which is totally against the interests of the workers
move an amendment to the motion: Provided that President shall not allow an amendment to be moved which if it had been a substantive motion ... amendment shall be relevant to, and within the scope of, motion to which it is proposed. (2) An amendment may not be moved which
misunderstood the amendment, which I have proposed. My amendment is not in respect of the appointment of Secretary to the Commission. My amendment ... There is an amendment to Clause 1. Now, the Minister to move amendment No.1
SHRI RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD: I beg to move :
“Page
motion for consideration of the Regional Rural Banks (Amendment) Bill, 2014, moved by Shri Jayant Sinha on behalf of Shri Arun Jaitly.
HON. DEPUTY SPEAKER ... Centre will be fixed not exceeding three years. I have moved an amendment to this effect. It is also said that these amendments will ensure
Constitution (61st Amendment Bill) 1988 which was introduced in the
Rajya Sabha on 24th November, 1988. The Bill sought to move "sports ... concurrent list (List III) through the
61st Amendment Bill in 1988. That move however did not succeed. The
Amendment was never carried. It is urged
Sh.Prem Nath Chopra Deceased Thru Lrs vs Sh.Arun Chopra & Ors. on 26
Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), whereby he has rejected the amendment application moved by the petitioner/appellant under Order VI-Rule17 CPC and the order ... amendment application. There was no delay in filing the amendment application as the issue was yet to be framed when the amendment application was moved
application for amendment of pleadings, complainant came to know
this fact on 9.11.2011, but the application for amendment was moved on
25.10.2012, after more than ... final arguments. Thus, it becomes clear that complainant did
not move for amendment at the earliest and learned State Commission rightly
came to the conclusion
