Ahal Ya Naik " and v. Muthusami (dead) by LRs. v. Angammal .
5. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties at some length and examining
relies upon the following judgments:-
V.Muthusami (dead) by LRs. Vs. Angammal, 2002 (2) RCR (civil)
329
The Indian Bank, Madras Vs.S.Krishnaswamy
also placed reliance upon V.Muthusami
(dead) by L.Rs. v. Angammal and others , AIR 2002 Supreme Court 1279
and Lourdu Mari David and others
Supreme Court in the case of
V.Muthusami (dead) by LRs. Vs. Angammal 2002 (2) RCR (Civil) 329
to contend that the decree of specific
Supreme
Court in V.Muthusami(dead) by L.Rs v. Angammal and others , AIR
2002 SC 1279, wherein it has been laid down that where
Supreme Court in V. Muthusami (dead) by L.R. v. Angammal .
8. I have considered this argument and find no force in the contention raised
Ahalya Naik , (2001) 6 SCC
600, V. Muthusami ( dead) by LRs vs. Angammal ( 2002) 3 SCC 316,
Subedar (Minor) vs. Usman and others
another, 2008 AIR SC 500; V.
Muthasami (dead) by LRs Vs. Angammal , 2002 AIR SC 1279; Chandrika
YAG DUTT
2026.05.18 17:50
I attest
2527 of 2007 (O & M) :5:
Angammal and others , AIR 2002 SC 1279, wherein also, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has laid down
Punjab Law Reporter 546; V. Muthusami (dead) by LRs., v.
Angammal and others , AIR 2002 Supreme Court 1279 and Nirmala
Anand v. Advent Corporation