dissentient judgment of Sankaran Nair J. in 'Angammal v. Aslami Sahib ' 38 Mad 710 (FB) (C) The following are the observations ... view taken by the majority in the case of 'Angammal v. M.M.S. Aslami' (C ) because the plaintiff had not come within
case Kandaswami Moopan v. Angammal it had been held:-
The possession of property is not at all the criterion for awarding maintenance under Section
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Angammal ; Kishori v. Gulabkhan reported in 1988 A.C.J. 860, K.K. Rain v. Smt. Masroor Anwar ; National
this context may be made to the case of Kandaswami Moopan v. Angammal wherein Mr. Justice Ramaswami observed at p. 349 that "The possession
Ismail Kani v. Nazar Ali [1903] 27 Mad. 211 Angammal v. Malie Mahomed [1915] 38 Mad. 710 Kanaya, Lal Jalan v. Rasik Lal Sadhukhan
after the expiry of the lease. Even on the view upon which Angammal v. M.M.S. Aslami Sahib (1915) 38 Mad 710 was finally
only have the value thereof
assessed and recover the same."
In Angammal vs. Malic Mohamed Syed Aslami Sahib reported
