made in that Chapter for the tribunal before which a person answering that description can be tried and as to the sentence that ... earlier decision of a Bench of this Court furnishes an answer to the objection to the sufficiency of the signature of the Chief Secretary
took a possible view?
(b) In case the answer to the above question is in the
affirmative, can it still be said that the order ... view taken by the Tribunal is patently erroneous
and illegal. We, therefore, answer question No.2 in the
negative and against the assessee
Kashiparekh & Co. 's case cited above is a complete answer to this question. Their Lordships said at page 722 of the report that ... included in the assessment for 1954-55?
(b) If the answer to the foregoing question is in the affirmative did the forgoing of the said
instance of the Commissioner of". Income-tax for answer by this court:
"(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances ... without giving the assessee an opportunity to rebut the same ?
If the answer to either of the above questions is in the negative, then
singly and solitary instance of any act does not seem to answer the oppressive continuity of conducting the affairs of the company implicit ... facts justified winding-up of the company.
8. There are two complete answers to this argument. The first answer is that to attempt
subject-matter of Income-tax Reference No. 201 of 1991 have been answered by this court, which decision of this court is reported ... Suman
Tea and Plywood Industries (P .) Ltd. and therefore answered accordingly. Similarly, the only question in R. A. No. 575/(Cal) of 1990, being
Calc. 1102. was the long course of decisions.
50. In answer to Radha Shyam Sircar v. Joy Ram Senapati (1890) I.L.R. 17 Calc ... Nath Sarma Roy (1884) I.L.R. 10 Calc. 1102. where an answer in the affirmative was given to the question, " whether, according
must necessarily be treated as capital receipts ?
(b) If the answer to the first question is in the negative, on the facts ... Thus, the said three questions have come up before us for answer. Mr. Deepak Shome, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Department, made
consideration that it is couched in too general terms, and that an answer to such a general question might lead to difficulty and misapprehension ... inasmuch as the answer to the first part of the reference is really sufficient to dispose of the matter, I do not think
case of the petitioner is that she was satisfied with her answers to the questions on which she was examined in the said examination ... good student and that some other students must have copied from her answer paper.
After considering these representations the Malpractices Committee at the said meeting
