compulsion' because the test subject is not
required to give verbal answers, thereby falling outside the
protective scope of Article ... impugned
techniques, even though the latter are not explicitly
enumerated. To answer this question, it will be necessary to
discuss the principles governing the interpretation
Ashok Kumar Todi vs Kishwar Jahan & Ors on 18 May, 2010
Author: Bhaskar Bhattacharya
Sahebrao in presence
of PW4 Dr. Deshmukh in question and answer form in his own
handwriting. PW2 had signed the same and taken thumb impression ... defence of the appellants was of total denial. During
the answers in examination effected under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. of
::: Downloaded
whether no prosecution can lie on such complaint?
Point (2): If answer to point No.1 is negative then whether it
is a mere irregularity ... found to be frivolous or mala fide, would be liable to
answer the charge of perjury or to indemnify the accused. In other words, when
Sahebrao in presence
of PW4 Dr. Deshmukh in question and answer form in his own
handwriting. PW2 had signed the same and taken thumb impression ... defence of the appellants was of total denial. During
the answers in examination effected under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. of
::: Downloaded
2000, PS Sultanpuri. She has stated that she had seen answer sheet bearing
Roll No. 8504 dated 06/03/2000. According to the school record ... said answer sheet
is of prosecutrix, student of 8th class. It is of subject "Grah Vigyan", consisting of
six pages. This answer sheet
report Ex.PW7/A and in his cross
examination, he has answered that he had not sealed and seized
anything from the spot ... from
all over Delhi regarding the preparing of site plans. He further
answered that IO had not given any rough sketch plan of the spot
Prevention Act was
registered.
9. In her further cross examination, the prosecutrix answered that she
was married to Sanjeev Puri, the younger brother ... Chirag Delhi, that was why she shifted to Uttam
Nagar. She answered that at the time of incident her mother was residing
at Solanki Road
shop near to the shop of her maternal
grand father. She further answered that her maternal grand father
received injury on his leg about ... closed her mouth.
12. The prosecutrix, in her further cross examination, has
answered that the house in question was having three stories and the
rape
time of the incident.
8. In her cross examination, she answered that the accused was
residing near her house in the same gali ... taken in the same to Seema Puri. She further
answered that there was movement of the public at the place where
accused
