orders of the Chief Justice, dt. July 3, 1986, to answer a question referred to larger Bench by our brother ... order of reference itself is bad and there is no necessity to answer the question referred to the Full Bench. His submission is that
result was declared by first publishing the model answer
keys for all questions of the preliminary examination which would
enable the candidate to make ... representation with respect to
correctness of any of these answers. Several representations were
received from different candidates. All these representations were
examined by specially constituted
technique of scaling, normalisation and moderation, in evaluating the answer sheets in the competitive examinations, where candidates appear in mass, is an accepted procedure adopted ... appearing and large number of examiners are involved in evaluating the answer- sheets. A Division Bench of this Court in the case reported
This batch of writ petitions seeks to challenge the
correctness of final answer key of the preliminary examination
issued by the respondent Rajasthan High Court ... award of bonus marks
for the deleted five questions. Also challenged answers to twenty
other questions on different grounds.
It may be noted
This batch of writ petitions seeks to challenge the
correctness of final answer key of the preliminary examination
issued by the respondent Rajasthan High Court ... award of bonus marks
for the deleted five questions. Also challenged answers to twenty
other questions on different grounds.
It may be noted
question for consideration by a Larger Bench.
7. Before we proceed to answer the question referred to us by the learned Single Judge, we consider ... opinion rightly made a statement at the bar that the answer to the question referred by the learned Single Judge for opinion by a Larger
have been resorted to; in case of difference, moderation is the answer. When under the Rules of 1999, no provision has been made to apply ... scaling system, many examiners are involved in marking the answering scripts relating to a subject; in different languages the answers are given i.e. English
Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules 1956, were either having more than one correct answer or answer accepted by the Rajasthan P.S.C. is wrong ... result of the same was declared on January 6, 2005 and answer key was published. The pattern of the examination was "Multiple choice objective
apart, further grievance is that there are certain wrong questions or their answers are incorrect - few examples whereof have been referred to by petitioners ... reply has admitted that wherver there are wrong questions or answers, benefit whereof has been extended and pro-rata marks have been increased in relation
revision of the merit list is due to correction in the answer key wherein certain questions were deleted or answers were modified ... result, a controversy was raised for correctness of the questions and answers. This court issued directions on the respondents to send the matter
