Ram Janak Maurya And Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic ... on 1 November, 2018
Ram Janak Maurya And Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic ... on 1
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 100 (1.61 seconds)Smt. Amita Tripathi (Tewari) vs The Director Of Education, Allahabad, ... on 28 February, 2018
against the petitioner and, as such, was not permitting the petitioner to mark her attendance in the attendance register of the Institution. There ... total marks for group discussion and oral interview (20% each). Though this Court held fixation of marks as arbitrary, being on higher side, it refused
Ranvijay Singh And 7 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 29 March, 2018
total of, marks awarded to each candidate on the basis of 10th and 12th Board examination results and marks obtained by him in Physical Efficiency ... selection process on the basis of 10th and 12th standard marks, is wholly irrational, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution
Himanshu Shukla And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 13 April, 2018
decision to abort the ongoing recruitment process is otherwise vitiated, being arbitrary, irrational and actuated by political considerations which lack bona fide. The details ... employment news dated 29.1.2011-4.2.2011. Selection was based upon quality point marks secured by an applicant. Petitioner's quality point marks worked
Sangeeta And 77 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 11 December, 2018
candidates, but concededly 56 marks were fixed for Other Backward Classes candidates and 20 marks were fixed for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates. Only ... submission of the learned counsel that the cut-off marks fixed was wholly arbitrary so as to offend the principles of equality enshrined under Article
Bhagwat Narain vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. And Others on 28 August, 2018
awarded total of 15.69, 69% marks out of total of 20 marks which were demarcated as maximum 12 marks under the head of such resources ... marks apart from 5 full marks for credit worthiness and this time, out of aforesaid 20 marks, petitioner has been awarded only 8.99 marks which
Pradeep Kumar And 9 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 27 November, 2018
Constitution of India which guarantees protection from arbitrariness and which is the bench mark of a rule of law of society. Such action therefore, needed ... form due process, the basic ingredient of rule of law. Whatever is arbitrary, is against the rule of law and arbitrariness means an action opposed
Soni Sonkar vs State Of U.P. And 03 Others on 5 October, 2018
marks, then alone modification in the marks originally awarded is made. The maximum marks was 75, thus, 15% of it comes to 11.25 marks ... marks. Therefore only when the difference in the challenge evaluation marks with the original marks is higher by 15 marks the University is required
Ajit Singh And 54 Others vs Union Of India And 4 Others on 20 August, 2018
which are required to be filled, and therefore, cut off marks published on 28.11.2011 be appropriately reduced, so as to consider petitioners' candidature against ... Candidates, having marks equal to the cut off in the respective category, have been denied appointment due to arbitrary adoption of tie criteria.
(d) Candidates
Rohit Kumar Pandey vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors on 10 October, 2018
more candidates obtain equal marks in the aggregate, the name of the candidate obtaining higher marks in the written examination shall be placed higher ... those who have obtained higher marks in the written examination for being called for interview is neither arbitrary or irrational nor the said rule