post of Assistant Professors
based on the interview cannot be termed as arbitrary, illegal against
law since as per clause 13 of the scheme ... selection
for the post of Assistant Professor on the basis of weightage marks
awarded for teaching experience and qualification. It is the policy
there was no
other entity using the said mark. The defendant therefore claimed that the
mark “Gold Winner” has become distinctive and identifiable only with ... judis/
8
defendant. It is an arbitrary mark coined and promoted by the defendant.
The defendant claimed to be the exclusive proprietor of the mark
mark, then he secures the cut off mark for selection. The appellant has not been awarded 1 mark which shows that there is total arbitrariness ... been awarded 4.5 marks. Instead he has been awarded 1 special mark. If the appellant is able to secure 4.5 marks, then he secures
failed in the one theory examination by lack of five marks, by granting grace marks only to the written examination one cannot say that ... which cannot be said to be either illegal or arbitrary.
23. Granting of grace marks can never be taken as a matter of right
selected)
Sl.No.
Name
Marks for Qualification
Marks for experience
Total marks for qualification and experience
Marks for interview
Total marks
1
Victor Albert ... marks, and the said fact alone contributed for their non selection.
(vii)Interview marks tilted the balance.
(viii)Marks were awarded in a most arbitrary
mark ZINCOVIT is
either inherently distinctive or has acquired distinctiveness falls for
consideration next. Trade marks are classified into about five
categories: invented, arbitrary, suggestive ... services in respect of which it is used, such trade mark is
considered arbitrary. If the trade mark suggests but does not describe
the qualities
mark ZINCOVIT is
either inherently distinctive or has acquired distinctiveness falls for
consideration next. Trade marks are classified into about five
categories: invented, arbitrary, suggestive ... services in respect of which it is used, such trade mark is
considered arbitrary. If the trade mark suggests but does not describe
the qualities
Plaintiffs vs Masti Health And Beauty Pvt. Ltd on 12 June, 2018
Author: C.V
total difference in the
marks between the two valuations comes to ‘41’ marks and not just ‘6’
marks as appears from the above table ... marks and the total difference in marks in the Paper-III is
’28.5’ marks. The detailed tabulation of the marks is filed in the typed
descriptive, (3) suggestive, (4) arbitrary or
fanciful. The lines of demarcation, however, are not always bright...”
A generic mark is one which describes a product ... purpose, ingredient or characteristic of a product or service;
and an arbitrary mark is chosen capriciously and does not bear any
discernible connection with
