Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 7419 (5.65 seconds)

WP(C)/3105/2016 on 21 June, 2023

would be required to secure a minimum of 60% marks in the interview, is highly arbitrary and contrary to the Arunachal Pradesh Judicial Service Rules ... power of the Government to provide such high marks for interview or that there was any arbitrary exercise of power." (SCC p.166, para
Gauhati High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document

Krbl Limited vs Manoj Sah on 27 March, 2023

applied/used for and therefore, it classifies as an arbitrary mark which is entitled to the highest extent of protection and that the arbitrary trademark ... India within the meaning of Section 56 of Trade Marks Act,1999. 3. It is further averred that plaintiff has acquired rights in the Registered
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next