District Forum wrongly concluded that the said notice
was illegal and arbitrary. The notice was issued as per the Circular
and, therefore, the findings recorded ... effect that all the material should be ISI Mark. Condition No.18 is to
the effect that in case the service charges deposited were deficient
Sarbjit Singh vs M/S Puma Realtors Private Limited on 14 September, 2016
Daily Order
Acc Ltd. vs Harinder Kaur on 9 March, 2016
2nd Additional Bench
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
ground that the impugned order is arbitrary, perverse and is bad in the eye of law. It was delivered without proper appreciation ... Delhi on 27.5.2008 where the doctors diagnosed Renal Calculi but placed a mark of query (?) on the diagnosis. At the same time, the appellant/complainant
Shri Rajiv Arora vs Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. on 9 February, 2016
FIRST ADDITIONAL
Navneet Kaur vs Punjabi University, Patiala & Another on 18 March, 2016
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH
Sandeep Kumar vs Max Elite on 24 February, 2016
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
Sanjay Sharma vs C.G.Housing Board on 19 July, 2016
CHHATTISGARH STATE
CONSUMER DISPUTES
M/S S.P. Singla Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. on 2
Dr. Satpal Kaur vs Veerpal Kaur on 18 May, 2016
Daily Order
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH
