mark impugned,
more specifically in cases of a coined/ arbitrary mark. She places reliance
upon the following decisions, wherein the Courts were not convinced with ... past 17 years in India. The mark, by virtue of its
prolonged use and arbitrary adoption, has maintained an
inherently distinctive character, such that
judgment
over the marks awarded by interviewing bodies
unless it is proved or obvious that the marking is
plainly and indubitably arbitrary or affected ... patently arbitrary or the risk of arbitrariness is so
high that a reasonable person would regard
arbitrariness as inevitable, that the assessment of
marks
while awarding marks in the interview arbitrarily awarded 8 marks to the
petitioner, whereas 19 marks has been awarded to the 4th respondent ... order to eliminate the petitioner, he has been awarded 8 marks and 19
marks to the 4th respondent respectively.
12. Learned State counsel was directed
marks,
accordingly petitioner has been awarded 4 marks and she is not entitled
for 16 marks for 4 awards. Petitioner has been awarded 6 marks ... marks, whereas the 2nd and 3rd respondents have been awarded 14 and 12
marks respectively for 15 marks which has led to arbitrariness in
awarding
Prudence Maynar And Another vs Mundhra Container Freight Station Pvt. ... on 11 April, 2017
Author
Prudence Maynard And Anr vs Mundhra Container Freight Station Pvt ... on 11 April, 2017
Author
General Manager and submits that there is an
arbitrary and illegal adjustment of marks in the garb of Potential
Assessment (PA).
48 The Petitioner refers ... complete arbitrariness, favoritism,
nepotism and lack of transparency. Mr. Buch would, therefore, submit
that the Petitioner's allegations stand proved by the marks allotted
General Manager and submits that there is an
arbitrary and illegal adjustment of marks in the garb of Potential
Assessment (PA).
48 The Petitioner refers ... complete arbitrariness, favoritism,
nepotism and lack of transparency. Mr. Buch would, therefore, submit
that the Petitioner's allegations stand proved by the marks allotted
General Manager and submits that there is an
arbitrary and illegal adjustment of marks in the garb of Potential
Assessment (PA).
48 The Petitioner refers ... complete arbitrariness, favoritism,
nepotism and lack of transparency. Mr. Buch would, therefore, submit
that the Petitioner's allegations stand proved by the marks allotted
General Manager and submits that there is an
arbitrary and illegal adjustment of marks in the garb of Potential
Assessment (PA).
48 The Petitioner refers ... complete arbitrariness, favoritism,
nepotism and lack of transparency. Mr. Buch would, therefore, submit
that the Petitioner's allegations stand proved by the marks allotted
