minimum qualifying marks in the interview, they could not
be selected only because their aggregate marks were higher than the marks scored by the
last ... 4835 of 2011 Page 7 of 13
found marks to be arbitrary, they should have challenged the same at the very first
instance. Instead Petitioners
marks obtained in the
English test were also included in the overall marks in the written test;
(d) No weightage of marks for the written ... marks
General knowledge : 10 marks
Skill/aptitude : 10 marks
Personality : 10 marks
Proficiency in Hindi : 5 marks
Achievements : 5 marks
Total marks : 100 marks
mandatory for promotion
from one year to the next year is illegal, arbitrary and ultra vires
and hence liable to be set aside ... other relevant clauses which provides
for pass percentage 50 marks per subject is illegal, arbitrary and
ultra vires, hence is liable to be set aside
trade-mark / service-mark "ICICI" was
adopted by the plaintiff in the year 1955 and the plaintiff‟s trade-
mark registrations date back ... contended before this court that the
plaintiffs trade-mark „ICICI‟ is an abbreviation of arbitrary words
consisting of "Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation
Gurgaon.
4. The plaintiff No.1 is the proprietor of the trade mark CHOR
BIZARRE which is registered in India under registration No.490488 ... stated that the trademark
'CHOR BIZARRE' is an arbitrary and highly distinctive mark for
restaurant services and due to prior adoption, registration, extensive
belonging to the reserved categories, the cut off
marks will be 40% of the total marks;"
5. The judgment in Devi Darshan Seth also ... marks and interview of 20% marks and that the
eligibility to be called for interview was of 50% marks in the written test
for Unreserved
belonging to the reserved categories, the cut off
marks will be 40% of the total marks;"
5. The judgment in Devi Darshan Seth also ... marks and interview of 20% marks and that the
eligibility to be called for interview was of 50% marks in the written test
for Unreserved
that the
petitioners had secured marks equivalent to the three
recommended candidates and, therefore, UPSC has acted in an
arbitrary and discriminatory manner in contravention ... Constitution
of India.
3. The petitioners had secured 305 marks, same as secured
by Rajesh Kumar Yadav, who was recommended by UPSC in
the supplementary
been given 9 marks for her 9 years of
experience. The basis of denial of these 9 marks was
illegal and arbitrary.
8. The petitioner
scheme is
that percentage of marks of the ACRs is necessarily linked with the
residency period whereby lesser marks are good only provided the
residency ... holding that
in interview also the marks which are obtained must necessarily be at
least that percentage of marks as are required in the correlated
